data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d225e/d225e5a12edd3bade4ef758a334eeaa4ccd88384" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b342/1b3423cbb3aba8de688af2c4ed4e9b169f6cd143" alt=""
This blog is dedicated to sharing the concept that our hands are essential to learning- that we engage the world and its wonders, sensing and creating primarily through the agency of our hands. We abandon our children to education in boredom and intellectual escapism by failing to engage their hands in learning and making.
Also relevant for me is Karl Marx's concept of alienation. According to Marx, man is self-actualized (becomes human) when he makes things that others then use. The Industrial Revolution and the resulting capitalist organization of production separates man from his product (through factory work) thus alienating him from his essential being. When I studied Marx in philosophy 101 and came across this concept, it was one of those "aha" moments for me that helped explain the satisfaction I got from building things and the sometimes emptiness that I saw in the lives of acquaintances who were not creative in any way, who merely saw themselves as "consumers".I haven't studied Marx, but I was surprised one time when I was telling a college honors student about my woodworking program and was informed by him that he thought it sounded "Marxist". Maybe he was right, though I would prefer to think that any human being paying attention to the kinds of feelings one gets from making things would arrive at the same conclusions concerning satisfaction and alienation. The principles and effects are universal.
The Concept of Mind (1949) is a critique of the notion that the mind is distinct from the body, and it is a rejection of the theory that mental states are separable from physical states. According to Ryle, the classical theory of mind, as represented by Cartesian rationalism, asserts that there is a basic distinction between mind and matter. However, the classical theory makes a basic "category-mistake," because it attempts to analyze the relation between "mind" and "body" as if they were terms of the same logical category. This confusion of logical categories may be seen in other theories of the relation between mind and matter. For example, the idealist theory of mind makes a basic category-mistake by attempting to reduce physical reality to the same status as mental reality, while the materialist theory of mind makes a basic category-mistake by attempting to reduce mental reality to the same status as physical reality.Thus is this morning's food for thought. Quite a lot to think about. Naturally, Gilbert Ryle, having spent most of his life at Oxford University, would lay a bit heavier emphasis on thought as "action" than would a craftsman, more attuned to physical reality. But one can thank Ryle's performance as the yapping dog Toto, alerting us that the Wizard is not exactly what we have believed him to be. The photo above is of Gilbert Ryle. You may think that this is an extremely long and boring post that has little to do with the Wisdom of the Hands. The point I would make is that to think that children in schools are "Minds to educate" separate from the needs of their bodies to make, move, express and thus prosper is the greatest of pedagogical errors.
Ryle rejects Descartes’ theory of the relation between mind and body, on the grounds that it approaches the investigation of mental processes as if they could be isolated from physical processes. In order to demonstrate how this theory may be misleading, he explains that knowing how to perform an act skillfully may not only be a matter of being able to reason practically but may also be a matter of being able to put practical reasoning into action. Practical actions may not necessarily be produced by highly theoretical reasoning or by complex sequences of intellectual operations. The meaning of actions may not be explained by making inferences about hidden mental processes, but it may be explained by examining the rules that govern those actions. According to Ryle, mental processes are merely intelligent acts. There are no mental processes that are distinct from intelligent acts. The operations of the mind are not merely represented by intelligent acts, they are the same as those intelligent acts. Thus, acts of learning, remembering, imagining, knowing, or willing are not merely clues to hidden mental processes or to complex sequences of intellectual operations, they are the way in which those mental processes or intellectual operations are defined. Logical propositions are not merely clues to modes of reasoning, they are those modes of reasoning.
The rationalist theory that the will is a faculty within the mind and that volitions are mental processes which the human body transforms into physical acts is therefore a misconception. This theory mistakenly assumes that mental acts are distinct from physical acts and that there is a mental world which is distinct from the physical world. This theory of the separability of mind and body is described by Ryle as "the dogma of the ghost in the machine."
He explains that there is no hidden entity called "the mind" inside a mechanical apparatus called "the body." The workings of the mind are not an independent mechanism which governs the workings of the body. The workings of the mind are not distinct from the actions of the body and may be better conceptualized as a way of explaining the actions of the body.
Cartesian theory holds that mental acts determine physical acts and that volitional acts of the body must be caused by volitional acts of the mind. This theory is "the myth of the ghost in the machine."
The problem is a problem of mind. We are trying to understand another culture whose pattern of belief, whose mind, is different from our own. Our own beliefs, our mindset, biases our view. It would be ideal, and this is not as silly as it sounds, if we could approach that other culture mindlessly, at least while we gather our data. This is the great promise of material culture; By undertaking cultural interpretation through artifacts, we engage the other culture in the first instance not with our mind, the seat of our cultural biases,but with our senses. Figuratively speaking, we put ourselves inside the bodies of the individuals who made or used these objects; we see with their eyes and touch with their hands.I had my own experience of that today. A friend shared my flight to Boston, with each of us heading for different conferences at MIT, but on different ends of the hands-on perspective. Mila, sitting in the row behind mine wanted me to see her new iPad, and all its wonderful tricks. It is amazing. It is intriguing and engaging and powerful. I, on the other hand, would advocate simpler technology, particularly for the young. Will young hands encountering real tools understand their use and their potential when wielded by skilled hands? Will they have aspirations that those hands be their own? Will hands that have never explored their full potential have a grasp of of the value of the artifacts of human history? We may be in the process of finding out. In the same book containing Prown's essay History from Things, Essays on Material Culture, Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi's essay, "Why We Need Things" explores our psychic dependency on objects.
We like to think that because objects are human made they must be under our control. However, this is not necessarily the case. An object with a specific form and function inevitably suggests the next incarnation of that object, which then almost certainly will come about. For instance, the first crude stone missile begat the spear, which begat the arrow and then the bolt, the bullet, and so on to Star Wars. Human volition seems to have less to do with this development than do the potentialities inherent in the objects themselves... Thus artifacts are sometimes symbiotic with humans, but at other times the relationship is parasitic, and survival of the object is at the expense of its human host.In the iPad, you can see the sequence of development that Csikszentmihalyi describes. iPod, iPhone, new generations of each leading to the Pad. Are these things being created at the expense of their human host? If all the creativity is inherent in the machine, what will be left of the human impulse to create? Just asking. The bells and whistles of new technology are enticing. Will there be a place in our future for simple skills of hand, shaping wood to become objects of useful beauty? Is that a good question to ask while visiting at MIT?
The United States economy is in serious danger from a growing mismatch between the skills that will be needed for jobs being created and the educational backgrounds (or lack thereof) of would-be workers. That is the conclusion of a mammoth analysis of jobs data being released today (June 15, 2010) by the Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce.I would not have been able to choose a career while in college. I had no idea that a life as a craftsman was available to me. Nor do most children today. So there is a lot of good to say about a liberal arts education, but it should include some form of skilled craftsmanship as a requirement of the core curriculum.
Hermeneutics is the study of interpretation theory, and can be either the art of interpretation, or the theory and practice of interpretation. Traditional hermeneutics — which includes Biblical hermeneutics — refers to the study of the interpretation of written texts, especially texts in the areas of literature, religion and law. Contemporary, or modern, hermeneutics encompasses not only issues involving the written text, but everything in the interpretative process. This includes verbal and nonverbal forms of communication as well as prior aspects that affect communication, such as presuppositions, preunderstandings, the meaning and philosophy of language, and semiotics.Hermeneutics is named for the Greek god Hermes, who was believed the "inventor of language and speech, a liar, a thief and trickster." The Greek view was that words can be used either to illuminate or hide the truth.
"The mind and hand are natural allies. The mind speculates; the hand tests the speculations of the mind by the law of practical application. The hand explodes the errors of the mind, for it inquires, so to speak, by the act of doing, whether or not a given theorem is demonstrable in the form of a problem. The hand is, therefore, not only constantly searching after the truth, but is constantly finding it."--Charles H. Hamm, 1886
"In other cases, even by the strictest attention, it is not possible to give complete or strict truth in words. We could not, by any number of words, describe the color of a ribbon so as to enable a mercer to match it without seeing it. But an accurate colorist can convey the required intelligence at once, with a tint on paper." -- John Ruskin, 1879While waiting for the pendulum to swing, returning hands-on learning to American schools, there are steps you can take yourself, thus finding a place in higher consciousness. Cook, clean, cleanse the mind by use of the hands, create, fix, make, tend, restore, repair, plant, harvest and make. Make good, Make whole. Hermeneutics is not just about interpreting for others, but about interpreting for ourselves and requires a foundation in the real world from which to discover truth.
In the second book of his Physics, Aristotle sets out the central concerns for students of the physical world, by which he means not only the world of nature but also that shaped by humans--the world of artifacts, if you will. At the center of these concerns is the recognition that there are two aspects to all things: matter and form. He chides earlier philosophers for being too much concerned with matter at the expense of understanding the form or essence of the thing. As befits Plato's star pupil, Aristotle urges us to pay more attention to form or design.Is it time to do a back flip? We have begun to flub up rather badly by failing to understand the material aspects of our universe. As children become further enthralled with the capacities of their iPhones (aren't we all?), are we missing some important matters of substance?
"Our addiction to materialism is in large part due to the paradoxical need to transform the precariousness of consciousness into the solidity of things. The body is not large, beautiful, and permanent enough to satisfy our sense of self. We need objects to magnify our power, enhance our beauty, and extend our memory into the future.Most of us have been horrified at the images coming from the Gulf of Mexico, the BP oil spill disaster and its consequences on the natural environment. We are arriving at an understanding of the costs of our dependence on fossil fuels, and our irresponsibility in the use of environmental resources to sustain a relentless parade of meaningless consumer goods through our personal lives into landfills. Csikszentmihalyi states further that
In looking at these functions, it seems clear that power objects are not only the most dangerous but also the most expensive with respect to scarce resources and labor. When things are necessary to prove dominance and superiority, human costs start to escalate very quickly. It is striking to note in comparison how inexpensive things that stand for kinship and relatedness tend to be. Tokens of remembrance, respect, and love typically have trivial intrinsic value and labor invested in them is usually voluntary. Thus, the kind of selves individuals choose to build have great consequences for the material culture and for the natural environment that must be despoiled in order to create it."
"The addiction to objects is of course best cured by learning to discipline consciousness. If one develops control over the process of the mind, the need to keep thoughts and feelings in shape by leaning on things decreases... A Brahmin can afford to live in an empty home, because he does not need objects to keep his mind on course."There are a variety of ways that we can reduce our addiction to objects as definition of self. One is to make music. Another is to grow things. One is to prepare food to serve others. Another is to care for the old or the young. Ironically, so too, is the making of beautiful and useful things. When we invest ourselves in an object, heart and soul, not in the owning of it, but in the making of it, it becomes a reflection of highest human principles. The making of it provides the discipline of consciousness that human beings so desperately require.